What Happens If I Was Partially at Fault?
One common misconception many people have about personal injury cases is that the only way one can recover financial compensation is if someone else was 100 percent at fault for the accident. As an injured person, it is important to know that you can still recover some financial compensation even if you were partially at fault for the accident. In fact, under the pure comparative negligence system utilized in the state of California, you can recover a portion of money for accident-related expenses as long as you were not completely at fault for the accident.
To give yourself the best chance at recovering financial compensation in your personal injury case, you should speak with an experienced and skilled legal representative about your options. For more information about comparative negligence in your case, contact a San Diego personal injury lawyer of Ritter & Associates today at (619) 296-0123 and schedule a free consultation.
Comparative Negligence in California
Under the pure comparative negligence system in California, a judge will first assign a percentage of fault for the accident to each party involved. In California, an injured individual can recover damages even if he or she was 99 percent responsible for the accident.
Because of this type of pure comparative negligence system, each party can recover damages from an accident as long as they were not 100 percent responsible. For examples, if two people were injured in a car accident and Person A was found to be 99 percent at fault, he or she can still hold Person B liable for 1 percent of all damages. Thus, if Person A suffers $1,000 worth of damages and was 99 percent at fault, Person B could be forced to pay $10.
If you or someone you know has been injured because of someone else’s negligent actions and believe the comparative negligence law applies to their case, contact a San Diego personal injury attorney of Ritter & Associates at (619) 296-0123 and get started on your case.